
| Inputs | Process | Outputs |
|
Financial, Physical and Equipment Resources: Resources Provided by U.S. Department of Education awarded a five-year Technology Innovation Challenge Grant (TICG) Resources provided by OUSD
Human Resources: Other:
|
LEVEL I: CER team works on the following evaluation activities with UD Project Staff to: P1.5.1 review and revise the DEM, P 1.5.3 attend meetings and grant conferences as needed, P1.5.4 prepare reports (for various stakeholders) as needed, P 1.5.5 maintain the evaluation Web site on the CER server. |
O1.5.1 DEM plan that enables all stakeholders to examine the path of the project as it progresses though the five years of implementation to reach the identified goals.
O 1.5.2-1.5.5 Completed documentation of evaluation activities, data analysis and reports as indicated in P 1.5.1.-1.5.5 |
|
LEVEL II: P 2.5.1 CER and UD review and revise the DEM, P 2.5.2 CER ß builds needed project-specific instruments, analyzes data, reports results to, and advises UD Project Staff based on formative data, P 2.5.3 UD and CER attend meetings and grant conferences as needed, P 2.5.4 CER prepares or helps UD prepare reports (for various stakeholders) as needed, P 2.5.5 CER maintains the evaluation Web site on the CER server. P 2.5.6 CER provides summative evaluation data and reports (year
5)
|
O 2.5.1 DEM plan that enables all stakeholders to examine the path of the project as it progresses though the five years of implementation to reach the identified goals.
O 2.5.2-2.5.5 Completed documentation of evaluation activities, instrumentation, data analysis and reports as indicated in P 2.5.1.- 2.5.5
2.5.6 Final Grant Reports | |
|
LEVEL III: P 3.5.1 Project Staff and Evaluation Team complete revision of DEM and begin documentation/description of formative data on outcomes and changes based on positive or negative discrepancies . |
O 3.5.1 Documentation of positive or negative discrepancies and any changes made based on that data. | |
|
P 3.5.2 Evaluation Activities Year 1:
|
O 3.5.2 Benchmark data on Language Arts and Social Studies teachers and students who participated in survey.
Benchmark data on parents who participated in survey.
| |
| P 3.5.3 Year 1: UD Staff and CER Team attended meetings in: Summer: Ann Arbor Fall: Washington, D.C. Fall: Salt Lake City Spring: Baltimore |
O 3.5.3 Year 1: Information collected from U.S Department of Education and other projects while attending meetings in Ann Arbor, Washington, D.C., Salt Lake City, and Baltimore | |
| P 3.5.4 CER and UD worked together to prepare First Year Performance Report | O 3.5.4 Performance Report for U.S. Department of Education | |
| P 3.5.5 CER created an Urban Dreams evaluation Web
site at http://www.tchp.org/oakland/ that will house information on the
DEM plan and other evaluation activities and results. Because Project
directors believe it is important to assure participants that they are
free to discuss problems and frustrations in a safe atmosphere, online
discussion groups will be created on the CER evaluation site to encourage
ongoing communication and feedback from project teachers. Teachers who
participate in these forums will be given project IDs that are known only
to the CER technical staff and a statement will appear in all synchronous
or asynchronous discussion areas that indicates that information cannot be
linked to names by OSUD. |
O 3.5.5 Information about the UD evaluation located on Web for stakeholders and other interested parties A convenient location for project participants to answer surveys,
discuss project issues and get information. | |
|
P 3.5.6 CER and UD will work together to collect all project data and interpret the results for a summative report. |
O 3.5.6 Final Project Report |


|
Management (1.0) |
Professional Development (2.0) |
Technology-Embedded Curriculum (3.0) |
Community (4.0) |
Evaluation (5.0) |
| Narrative | Narrative | Narrative | Narrative | Narrative |
| IPO | IPO | IPO | IPO | IPO |