
5.0 Evaluation
| Inputs | Process | Outputs |
|
Financial, Physical and Equipment Resources: Resources Provided by U.S. Department of Education awarded a five-year Technology Innovation Challenge Grant (TICG) Resources provided by OUSD
Human Resources: Other:
|
LEVEL I: CER team works on the following evaluation activities with UD Project Staff to: P1.5.1 review and revise the DEM, P 1.5.3 attend meetings and grant conferences as needed, P1.5.4 prepare reports (for various stakeholders) as needed, P 1.5.5 maintain the evaluation Web site on the CER server. |
O1.5.1 DEM plan that enables all stakeholders to examine the path of the project as it progresses though the five years of implementation to reach the identified goals.
O 1.5.2-1.5.5 Completed documentation of evaluation activities, data analysis and reports as indicated in P 1.5.1.-1.5.5 |
|
LEVEL II: P 2.5.1 CER and UD review and revise the DEM, P 2.5.2 CER ß builds needed project-specific instruments, analyzes data, reports results to, and advises UD Project Staff based on formative data, P 2.5.3 UD and CER attend meetings and grant conferences as needed, P 2.5.4 CER prepares or helps UD prepare reports (for various stakeholders) as needed, P 2.5.5 CER maintains the evaluation Web site on the CER server. P 2.5.6 CER provides summative evaluation data and reports (year 5)
|
O 2.5.1 DEM plan that enables all stakeholders to examine the path of the project as it progresses though the five years of implementation to reach the identified goals.
O 2.5.2-2.5.5 Completed documentation of evaluation activities, instrumentation, data analysis and reports as indicated in P 2.5.1.- 2.5.5
2.5.6 Final Grant Reports |
|
|
LEVEL III: P 3.5.1 Project Staff and Evaluation Team complete revision of DEM and begin documentation/description of formative data on outcomes and changes based on positive or negative discrepancies . |
O 3.5.1 Documentation of positive or negative discrepancies and any changes made based on that data |
|
|
P 3.5.2 Evaluation Activities Year 1:
|
O 3.5.2 Benchmark data on Language Arts and Social Studies teachers and students who participated in survey.
Benchmark data on parents who participated in survey.
|
|
| P 3.5.3 Year 1: UD Staff and CER Team attended meetings in: Summer: Ann Arbor Fall: Washington, D.C. Fall: Salt Lake City Spring: Baltimore |
O 3.5.3 Year 1: Information collected from U.S Department of Education and other projects while attending meetings in Ann Arbor, Washington, D.C., Salt Lake City, and Baltimore |
|
| P 3.5.4 CER and UD worked together to prepare First Year Performance Report | O 3.5.4 Performance Report for U.S. Department of Education | |
| P 3.5.5 CER created an Urban Dreams
evaluation Web site at http://www.tchp.org/oakland/ that will house
information on the DEM plan and other evaluation activities and
results. Because Project directors believe it is important to assure
participants that they are free to discuss problems and frustrations
in a safe atmosphere, online discussion groups will be created on the
CER evaluation site to encourage ongoing communication and feedback
from project teachers. Teachers who participate in these forums will
be given project IDs that are known only to the CER technical staff
and a statement will appear in all synchronous or asynchronous
discussion areas that indicates that information cannot be linked to
names by OSUD. |
O 3.5.5 Information about the UD evaluation located on Web for stakeholders and other interested parties A convenient location for project participants to answer surveys,
discuss project issues and get information.
|
|
|
P 3.5.6 CER and UD will work together to collect all project data and interpret the results for a summative report.
|
O 3.5.6 Final Project Report |

|
Management (1.0) |
Professional Development (2.0) |
Technology-Embedded Curriculum (3.0) |
Community (4.0) |
Evaluation (5.0) |
| Narrative | Narrative | Narrative | Narrative | Narrative |
| IPO | IPO | IPO | IPO | IPO |