CONCLUSIONS
Evaluation Results of Second Year Teacher Interview - Level II Process and Output Design | |
![]()
Teachers who participated in the second year interview were generally positive about the changes in their teaching and student learning as a result of the Urban Dreams Project. Despite the technical problems, particularly in terms of internet connectivity, teacher enthusiasm was still evident in the teacher responses. However, only 22 of the 50 teachers participating in the first cohort chose to be interviewed. It is unclear whether the teachers who did choose to respond may be considered representative of the entire first year cohort. The major commendations went to project support staff. Teachers were positive about the training and support they received in both technology and curriculum.
| This has been
one of the most useful things to happen in my classroom - which would benefit my
students immensely. | |
| I like the
way the activities are tied into such renowned and scholarly projects like the MLK
Papers from Stanford. | |
|
So far it is
one of the best projects I have ever been associated with. They are doing a great job. | |
| As long as experts are good teachers, we're bound to learn. I'm looking forward to the Powerpoint class. I'm learning on my own (and from the kids) so that the class will answer my questions and advance my skills. | |
|
The leadership
team is great: professional, smart, providing excellent
workshops. Just more of the same! I especially like connections with University
scholars and programs. | |
|
This is the best staff development program I've
ever seen in terms of providing resources to teachers - and I've got 33 years in
education. | |
| This is an
extremely well-run project. |
![]()
REFERENCES TO CHANGE AS A RESULT OF URBAN DREAMS
The 22 teachers participating in this second year interview made 44 general references to positive changes in their teaching practice and use of technology as a result of the Urban Dreams Project. In order to determine what areas teachers perceived as impacted by Urban Dreams, teacher interviews were coded and references to key code words were counted using Ethnograph software. The major change reported was in the area of improved technology resources (40 references). Teachers reported improved computer literacy for themselves as well as their students (24 references). Teachers also reported a significant increase in the use of the internet (22 references) for student and teacher research. Improved student learning was reported in 14 references.
REFERENCES TO POSITIVE CHANGE
| Improved Technology Resources | 40 |
| Integration of Curriculum and Technology | 30 |
| Curriculum and Technology Support | 29 |
| Technology Training | 25 |
| Improved Computer Literacy - Students/Teachers | 24 |
| Increased Use of Internet | 22 |
| Improved Student Learning | 14 |
| Improved Professional Collaboration | 14 |
| Improved Computer Access for Students/Teachers | 13 |
Table: References to Change as a Result of Urban Dreams Project - (44 References in 22 interviews).
One key areas of interest for this evaluation was related to teachers' perceptions concerning successful integration of technology and curriculum. Teachers made general references to the integration of technology and curriculum 30 times in the interviews. The Urban Dreams project was to be focused on English and Social studies curriculum areas. It was determined that curriculum remained a focus for teachers. Combining the references to general curriculum and English and Social Studies (which were exclusive categories), 30 references were made to curriculum. In addition, 22 references were made to the specific focus on human and civil rights.
| References to Impact on Classroom Curriculum | |
| Integration of Curriculum and Technology | 30 |
| Human and Civil Rights | 22 |
| General Curriculum | 17 |
| Research and Internet | 15 |
| English and Social Studies | 13 |
References to Impact on Classroom Curriculum
![]()
The second year teacher interview primarily investigated the second level of the project evaluation design. The focus was on professional development and the development of technology-embedded curriculum for teachers of English and Social Studies. The second year of the project moved beyond the planning stages and initial technology and curriculum training to integration of technology into classroom instruction.
For a more complete view of the original project evaluation design, go to: Urban Dreams Evaluation Project Site. Below is an overview of the project in the form of an evaluation map.

![]()
Evaluation Results of Second Year Interview - Level II Process and Output Design
Included in this report are the Narratives and Inputs/Process/Outputs (IPO) Statements for the Level II Professional Development 2.0 and Curriculum Development 3.0 components of the original Urban Dreams Evaluation Research Design. Outputs were examined and evaluated according to results of the second year teacher interview responses. Shaded process and output cells in the IPO tables indicate that results of the second year teacher interview data support successful progress towards achievement of the desired output. Shaded cells for process indicate that the components of the process have been put in place during the second level of the grant. Shaded cells for output indicate significant progress toward accomplishing the goals of the Urban Dreams Project during the second year of the grant.
| 2.0 Professional Development Narrative | |
| 2.0 Professional Development IPO | |
| 3.0 Curriculum Development Narrative | |
| 3.0 Curriculum Development IPO |
The goal of the Urban Dreams professional development program is to provide high school teachers of Language Arts and
Social Studies and support staff with new strategies and techniques necessary to help high school students improve expository
writing and historical thinking skills in the context of human and civil rights.
Teachers will be trained in project based learning methodologies, Internet research strategies, expository writing teaching
skills and how to integrate technology in the context of the curriculum.
Project partners such as the Interactive University at UC-Berkeley, the Martin Luther King Jr. Papers Project at Stanford
University, and the World Affairs Council will provide enriched content and
technological access to original source materials as well as technological
expertise and tools to make the success of this project possible.
Building capacity and sustainability are additional goals of the professional development component and to that end a
number of Teacher Leaders will be designated to work with each project partner. Teacher Leaders will work in partnership
with project personnel to design materials suitable for inner city high school
students and that address district, state and national content standards. Teacher Leaders will be asked to participate in
the major Urban Dreams Summer Institutes and to provide coaching for other teachers who participate in the grant.
The overall design of the UD professional development will be to establish the Teacher Leader group to work closely
with the project partners, the conducting of an 8 day Summer Institute for each year's cohort of teachers, provision for ongoing
technology training throughout the school year and coaching, both on site and on line. The construction of an electronic
community and of on line resources to support the teachers will be accomplished
by the establishment of web pages, live and electronic access to staff development, and teacher access to electronic
community tools. KDOL, the district cable television station and distance
learning will be to deliver content as well provide professional development options.
Level II Professional Development IPO Statement 2.0
| Component | Process | Output |
| Project Leader UD Staff Curriculum and Inst. staff Appropriate Project partner Instructional Resources |
P2.1 Teacher cohorts for each partner and project identified, recruited and contracted | O 2.1 Projects and teachers are matched. Pilots are started in each TL classroom. |
| P2.2 Technology training within context of content areas appropriate for each cohort is identified. Project Based Learning training is conducted for all cohorts Training in classroom and tech equipment management in accordance with District Technology Plan |
O 2.2 Best practices and technology integration disseminated in UDSIs All LA and SS students of Cohort teachers complete 1 or more research investigations Teachers and students have access to working equipment in a high expectation learning environment. |
|
| P2.3 UD
staff and teachers collaboratively identify and disseminate best practices and strategies through UD sponsored conferences, meetings, teacher-to-teacher mentoring and classroom observations. |
O O2.3 PTs collaborate with colleagues and UD staff to present and participate in conferences, meetings, and teacher-to-teacher dialogs on implementation of best practices and strategies in their classrooms. |
|
| P2.4 Teachers attend Summer Institutes planned and organized to provide professional development supporting the integration of technology, best practices, and enhanced content knowledge into UD classrooms. |
O2.4 Teachers are prepared to begin implementation during the following school year. |
|
| P2.5 Content experts from universities and community organizations will work with teachers to enhance content knowledge about issues related to human and civil rights. |
O2.5 Teachers integrate enhanced knowledge of human and civil rights into their course content. |
Level II 3.0 Standards Based Curriculum Supported by Technology Narrative
Urban Dreams will integrate with and support the curriculum that has been developed by the district Language Arts and
Social Studies curriculum teams. A major task to be undertaken by the UD grant is to help high school teachers become
knowledgeable about content standards. Teachers will learn to construct standard
based lessons with embedded technology. These lessons will focus on assisting students to reach mastery of the content.
The current state of standards awareness, installed technologies, and technology practices in the curriculum will be assessed.
Strengths and weaknesses will be identified and used to guide the course of professional development.
The development of electronic resources to support the curriculum will be explored with the project partners. This will
include the development of web pages, original source materials and
collaborative tools to create learning communities.
The end results of these efforts will be to create meaningful, content rich, technology rich environments for both teachers
and students. Curriculum embedded technologies native and transparent to teaching styles and content delivery will result in
significant gains in LA and SS achievement for OUSD high school students.
3.0 Curriculum Development IPO Statement - Level II
| Inputs | Process | Outputs |
| Project Leader UD Staff Curriculum and Inst. staff Appropriate Project partners Current NETS |
P2.1 Current resources and
practices of teachers and of partners examined through the use of surveys, observations and interviews Identification of serendipitous resources. |
O 2.1 Document detailing prevailing practices that concern tech integration. Identification of areas of need or weakness in terms of curriculum embedded technology. |
| P2.2 Innovative tech strategies and enhanced content developed in collaboration with lead teachers, UD staff, C&I staff and partners. Innovative methodologies and best tech integration practices identified in pilot projects |
O 2.2 Innovative technology tools and practices and new content incorporated into the curriculum. Significant increase in use of curriculum that is tech infused. Tech integration knowledge of teacher significantly impacted. |
|
| P2.3 Teacher assessment of impact on student achievement and staff practices through CEAs, either district or teacher developed, interviews, surveys, and test scores. |
O 2.3 Formative data gives UD staff a basis for informed decisions in regard to modifications in programs. |

© Copyright 2001 Center for Evaluation and Research, LL