

![]()
Urban Dreams provided basic computer training for
parents during the 2001-2002 school year (Objective 3.1).
The Marcus Foster Institute provided the trainings through a subcontract
with the school district. The
technology trainings were mandatory for parents prior to their participation in
the Take-Home Computer program. Over
300 parents participated in the trainings during the 2001-2002 academic year.
The trainings were designed to provide parents with basic computer
concepts and skills through hands-on use of computers.
To measure gains in
specific competencies related to computer use, trainers developed and
administered workshop evaluation assessments during the first and last sessions.
As Table 17 demonstrates, approximately the same number of parents took
both the pre and post workshop evaluation assessments.
The majority of the respondents were female African-Americans:
|
Gender |
African-American |
Asian |
Hispanic |
Other |
Total |
|
Female |
142 |
28 |
31 |
7 |
208 |
|
Male |
46 |
15 |
14 |
4 |
79 |
|
Total |
188 |
43 |
45 |
11 |
287 |
The evaluation of the
parent technology trainings also included a summative evaluation form that
elicited participant feedback on the trainings themselves. The summative evaluation form contains six questions
and a corresponding likert scale. Participants
are asked to rank from “1” (lowest) to “4” (highest), the quality of the
training using six indicators. Section
2 consists of three open-ended questions. The
following table provides an overview of the results of the summative evaluation
form:
Questions
|
Number
of Respondents |
1 (Lowest) |
2 |
3 |
4 (Highest) |
Median |
|
Goals
for the training were clear. |
253 |
1 |
6 |
54 |
192 |
4 |
|
Instructor
met the training session goals. |
252 |
2 |
4 |
44 |
202 |
4 |
|
Training
session/instructor was clear and organized. |
253 |
4 |
38 |
211 |
253 |
4 |
|
Handouts
were relevant and useful. |
250 |
3 |
4 |
53 |
190 |
4 |
|
Training
information was useful. |
252 |
1 |
4 |
37 |
210 |
4 |
|
Information
was understandable. |
250 |
2 |
3 |
43 |
202 |
4 |
The median
score on the four-point scale was 4 indicating that the vast majority of
participants thought that the trainings were of the highest quality. On average
over 82% of the participants gave each quality indicator the highest rating.
![]()
A major reason for the development of the Urban Dreams
project was the lack of technology access by students within the classroom.
The vast majority of students in the target secondary schools attended
classrooms that did not have computer technology or access to the Internet.
Similarly, the teachers in those classrooms rarely used computer
technology for instructional purposes.
Urban Dreams has made a significant impact on the
access to technology by both students and parents.
More students and their parents are accessing technology on a regular
basis as a direct result of this project. The
project is accomplishing this by: a)
the placement of technology into secondary social studies and English
classrooms; and b) the placement of refurbished computers into the homes of
students who attend those same classrooms.
A major activity of the Urban Dreams project has been
the building of infrastructure including wiring classrooms for the Internet,
purchase of computers and software and the placement of the technology within
each of the more than 50 classrooms used by Urban Dreams teachers.
This undertaking was accomplished through a joint effort between
district, school site, and project staff.
The district has made extensive use of state and local funds to support
this effort.
As a result of this undertaking, all of the classrooms
of participating teachers currently have high speed Internet access, a laptop
computer, 5 desktop computers, software, a VCR and a large presentation monitor.
In addition, Urban Dreams provides each school site with two class sets
of "Alpha Smarts" keyboards and two projectors for classroom
presentations. Urban Dreams and district staff also provide ongoing technical
assistance.
Participating teachers are overwhelmingly supportive of the new technology. They are increasingly using technology as a part of their instructional programs. Students also use the technology as part of their regular instructional program throughout the day. Several project teachers have reported that students from other classrooms lacking equipment often use project technology before and after school.
© Copyright 2002 Center for Evaluation and Research, LL