Professional Development

Summer Institutes
Cohort 2 Summer Institute: 2001
Expository Writing Project
Technology Workshops
Curriculum Lesson Plans
Teacher Interview Report

 

 

Summer Institutes

The Summer Institute is designed to:

Include presentations by individuals and partner projects that focused on helping teachers and students enhance and deepen their content knowledge;

Provide training in the use of the equipment teachers received for their professional use (laptop computer) and for their classroom (five computers, T.V./V.C.R. and printer);

Include presentations from teachers that made connections between content, technology, and instruction designed to improve students’ skills in reading and writing expository text;

Provide teacher participants time to develop materials and lessons to use in their classrooms during the 2000-2001 school year; and

Provide participants, partner projects, and urban dreams staff time to develop plans for how to best work together throughout the 2000-2001 school year.

 

 

Cohort 2 Summer Institute: 2001

A major goal of the Summer Institute is to foster a professional learning environment while simultaneously building a greater knowledge base of the content presented. Summer Institute participants were also provided with a number of books related to human and civil rights, as well as best instructional practices.  Throughout the two weeks, participants were asked to read excerpts from the following books:

Call & Response: The Riverside Anthology of the African American Literary

 Reading for Understanding: A Guide to Improving Reading in Middle and High School Classrooms by Schoenback, Greenleaf, Cziko, Hurwitz

Writing and Thinking with Computers – A Practical and Progressive Approach by Monroe

A Map of Hope – Women’s Writing on Human Rights: An International Literary Anthology edited by Agosin

A Different Mirror – A History of Multicultural America by Takaki

The Eyes on the Prize – Civil Rights Reader edited by Carson, Garrow, Gill, Harding, Hine

 

The following tables provide an overview of the Cohort 2 Institute’s daily schedule during the of the summer of 2001:

Cohort 2 Summer Institute: 2001 - Week One

Monday 7/16

Tuesday 7/17

Wednesday 7/18

Thursday 7/19

Friday 7/20

A.M.

Overview of Summer Institute

 

Keynote Speaker - Clayborne Carson, Director Martin Luther King Jr. Papers Project, Stanford University

 

A.M.

Working with the Urban Dreams website

 

Working with "Mapmaker"

- Working group meeting

A.M.

Julianne Traylor – Chair of Amnesty International

Board of Directors

Sushanna Ellington - Amnesty International Teachers' Committee

Preparation - read "Universal Declaration of Human Rights" in A Map of Hope

A.M.

Working with “Inspiration” – Creating graphic organizers for students and teachers

- Working group meeting

"Struggling With the Meaning of Tolerance"

A.M.

Tech Training- The Gale Group – On line resources

“History Resource Center”

“Discovering U.S., World, & Multicultural History”

“Contemporary Authors”

P.M.

Integrating content and technology –a unit created in collaboration between Oakland teachers and the King Papers Project

P.M.

“Expository Reading and Writing:  Beginning a Conversation”

 

Deborah Juarez – Fremont High School

Alison McDonald – Fremont High School

 

 

P.M.

Preparation – Read relevant content standards,

“Essential and Unit Questions,”

"From Trivial Pursuit to Essential Questions and Standards-Based Learning"

English teachers –

Teaching from the Core literature list and anthologies

P.M.

Netsearching - exploring information connected to essential questions, course content, and curriculum project

 

Preparation – read introduction and chapter 1 in Writing and Thinking With Computers

P.M.

Tech Optional -

Exploration, coaching,

project development

 

 

Cohort 2 Summer Institute: 2001 - week two

Monday 7/23

Tuesday 7/24

Wednesday 7/25

Thursday 7/26

Friday 7/27

A.M.

Louis Segal – Center for Latin American Studies, UC Berkeley,


”Why Teach Latin American History and Literature?”

 

A.M.

Tech Integration in the History and English Classrooms

Dave and Marilyn Forrest,

Logan High School, Union City

A.M.

“California Heritage”   

Images and Documents from UC Berkeley’s Bancroft Library and the “American Memory” Collection from the Library of Congress

A.M.

Dr. Patricia Liggins Hill, University of San Francisco, General Editor of Call & Response: The Riverside Anthology of the African American Literary Tradition

A.M.

Tech Optional –

Exploration, coaching,

project development

P.M.

Harry Kreisler and Nanou Matteson, University of California, Berkeley

"Connecting Students to the World"

P.M.

Teacher work time

 

P.M.

The Urban Dreams home computer program – collaborating with the Marcus Foster Institute

Tech support

P.M.

- Working group meeting

- Preparation - read 

"The Technology Puzzle" and "Can Computers Change the System"

P.M.

 

 

The evaluators developed an exit survey for Cohort 2 participants in the 2001 Summer Institute.  The following table provides an overview of their responses:

Cohort 2 Summer Institute 2001

 

Very
Unsatisfactory

Unsatisfactory

No Opinion/ Neutral

Satisfactory

Very Satisfactory

N

King Papers

 

 

 

21.43%

78.57%

28

Expository Reading and Writing

 

 

7.14%

42.86%

50.00%

28

Amnesty International

 

3.70%

 

18.52%

77.78%

27

Inspiration/Netsearching

 

 

7.41%

33.33%

59.26%

27

Essential Questions

 

3.70%

14.81%

40.74%

40.74%

27

Gale Group Training

 

 

21.74%

39.13%

39.13%

23

IU Why Teach Latin American Studies

 

 

 

17.86%

82.14%

28

IU Connecting Students to the World

 

14.29%

14.29%

53.57%

17.86%

28

Tech Integration in History and English

 

 

 

10.71%

89.29%

28

Cal Heritage

 

14.81%

3.70%

55.56%

25.93%

27

Content Expert-African American Lit

 

 

 

 

100.00%

28

Marcus A. Foster Home Parent computer giveaway

 

 

25.93%

48.15%

25.93%

27

Teacher Group Time

3.57%

 

 

50.00%

46.43%

28

Teacher Work Time

 

 

3.57%

25.00%

71.43%

28

The results contained in the above table indicate that the overwhelming majority of participants were satisfied with the quality and content of the workshops.  The only “very unsatisfactory” response given indicated that one participant was unhappy with the amount of teacher group time allotted during the institute.

Samples of the responses given to the open ended questions for this cohort of teachers during the Summer Institute (Cohort 2 2001) follow:

The Summer Institute was excellently organized, and activities were truly interesting and helpful.  The speakers were excellent.  For the most part, presenters were outstanding – interesting, informative, dynamic people who were fascinating to listen to.  This was one of the best sessions like this that I have ever attended.  I would like to have had more time to work with the technology, but all the time was well spent.  I find little to criticize about the Summer Institute and much to praise.  Thank you!

This vision turned grant turned reality really does give teachers the tools to learn and utilize technology in our classrooms.  It is great that this program exists to bring people who weren’t raised on computers to be up to date with our students.  BRAVO!  Technical support is great, too!!

 

Expository Writing Workshop

The project sponsored a one-week expository writing workshop in July of 2001.  The writing workshop was designed to give Cohort 1 teachers the opportunity to reflect on the first year of implementation and/or further develop specific curriculum projects.  The following table provides an overview of the institute’s daily schedule for the Cohort 1 expository writing workshop for summer 2001.

Table 11. Cohort 1 expository writing workshop -summer 2001

Monday 7/9

Tuesday 7/10

Wednesday 7/11

Thursday 7/12

Friday 7/13

A.M.

Welcome and Introductions

Agenda and goals for the week - expectations, questions, connections to standards.

Participants discuss what they will be working on.

A quick view of the Urban Dreams Website.

Writing Time

A.M.

Discussion of curriculum model -

"What Does it Means to Be an American?

 

Group Meeting/

 

Writing Time

A.M.

Writing Time

A.M.

Discussion of reading

"Alice Walker in the Classroom"

 

Writing Time

 

 

 

 

Lunch provided

A.M.

Group Meeting/

Writing Time

P.M.

Writing Time

 

 

3:00 - Check-in

P.M.

Writing Time

 

 

3:00 - Check-in

P.M.

Group Meeting/

 

Writing Time

3:00 - Check-in

P.M.

Discussion of reading -

"Diving With Whales: Five Reasons for Practitioners to Write for Publication"

Writing Time

3:00 - Check-in

P.M.

Works-in-Progress

Readings/Discussion

 

Planning for the 2001-2002 school year - what next?

The evaluators developed an exit survey for participants in the one-week expository writing workshop.  The following table provides an overview of the exit survey results:

  Cohort 1 expository writing workshop - Summer 2001

 
  Agree Somewhat Agree Neutral Somewhat Disagree Disagree

N

 
My time spent this week was worthwhile 100.00%        

17

 

The staff provided the technical assistance I needed

94.12%

 

5.88%

 

 

17

 

The technological and instructional resources were beneficial

82.35%

 

17.65%

 

 

17

 

I would recommend this type of professional development to other colleagues

94.12%

5.88%

 

 

 

17

 

The above results demonstrate that every participant found the workshop worthwhile.  Nearly everyone received adequate technical assistance and would recommend this type of workshop to others.  However, a significant number of the participants were more neutral as to the benefit of the provided resources.

 

 

The following are a sample of the responses given to the open ended questions for this cohort of teachers during the expository writing workshop (Cohort 1 Summer 2001):

The hands-on experience greatly helped me.  We had at least four facilitators; people to call on for help, maybe more.  I made more progress that I ever expected.

Ann Kruze and Stan Pesick have created an atmosphere enabling the ‘pursuit of truth in the company of friends.’  I learned from the others in the session.  Also, the techs were a huge help in learning the new technology.  This is the way to keep excellent teachers in the district and the way to learn how to excel in the classroom.

When asked if there was anything that could be done to improve the workshop one respondent wrote:

I’m not sure.  I felt I could have been somewhat more productive in terms of writing output, but I felt I was given all of the support I could hope for.

 

 

Technology Workshops

The project sponsored several professional development activities to support teachers during the 2001-2002 school year.  These include ongoing workshops to assist teachers with integrating technology into their curriculum.  Collaborative partners provided direct input and resources into these workshops.  Table 13 provides an overview of the technology workshops offered during the 2001-2002 academic year:

Calendar for 2001-2002 technology workshops

Class code

Class Title

Total Hour

Total Enrollees

CLS01133

Microsoft PowerPoint

12

5

CLS01134

Photoshop For General Use and Web Graphics

9

8

CLS01135

Complete Web Page Design

12

14

CLS01137

Digital Cameras & Image Editing

3

11

CLS01138

Digital Cameras & Image Editing

3

6

CLS01139

Scanners & Image Editing

3

9

CLS01140

Scanners & Image Editing

3

4

CLS01141

Net Searching

3

5

CLS01142

Net Searching

3

2

CLS01143

Inspiration

3

4

CLS01144

Inspiration

3

4

CLS01226

Dreamweaver & Fireworks (1) Class

3

13

CLS01228

Dreamweaver & Fireworks (2) Class

3

16

CLS01233

Dreamweaver & Fireworks (3) Class

3

3

CLS01234

Net Searching

3

3

CLS01235

Inspiration

3

7

CLS01236

Using OTX Recycled computers in the UD

3

4

A major intermediate outcome of the professional development activities of the project has been the development of curriculum units by teachers.  Initially, these units were developed with the broad charge by project staff to create units that integrated technology into the target core content areas.   To further direct this process, the project staff and evaluators created the Urban Dreams TICG lesson plan rubric (attached).  This rubric addresses key components of curriculum development which have subsequently guided Urban Dreams’ teachers as they create curriculum related to their area of study.

 

 

Curriculum Lesson Plans

The following is a summary of the curriculum/lesson plans created by teachers through the summer of 2002.   

Urban Dreams Lesson Plans: http://www.urbandreamsproject.org/lessonplans/index.html.

Curriculum Lesson Plan Guidelines

Urban Dreams Lesson Plan Rubric

  Lesson plans created by Urban Dreams project participants

Lesson Plan

 Developed by Urban Dreams Teachers

Subject

Grade

Critical Consumerism
by J. Flaningam

Language Arts

Grade 9

Ceremony new
by L. Coleman

Language Arts

Grade 11

Democracy & Campaign Financing
by M. Wolfe

Social Studies  

Grade 12  

Four Foot Feat new
by M. Scott

Language Arts

Grade 9

Genocide
by G. Danning

Social Studies  

Grade 10  

House on Mango Street
by M.Scott

English/ELD

Grade 9 

House on Mango Street new
by E. Carlson

English/ELD

Grade 9 

Human Rights
by P. Arabia

World Cultures

Grade 10

"An Inquiry Unit into the Triangle
Shirtwaist Factory Fire 1911
by M. Laska

Social Studies

Grade 11

Insanity Defense Pleas new
by P. Tinloy

Psychology

Grade 12

A Lesson Before Dying new
by M. Scott

English/ELD

Grade 9

Major Psychological Disorders
by P. Tinloy

Psychology

Grade 12

Science Fiction
by P. Pugh

English

Grade 9 

Shadow of the Dragon new
by L. Delaney

English

Grade 9 

Sula : Love & Death
by L. Delaney

English  

Grade 9 

Taming of the Shrew new
by S. King

English  

Grade 10

"There Was A Certain Type of Fire
That No Water Could Put Out"
by M. Herd-Chambers and S. Pesick

Social Studies

Grade 11

Thousand Pieces Of Gold
by L. Delaney

English  

Grade 9 

Wild Swans new
by D. Gordon

English  

Grade 12

 

 

 

© Copyright 2002 Center for Evaluation and Research, LL